Title
Communication: Correspondence from the law office of McLane & Middleton Re: pending petitions for wire and pole location to attach small cell antennas and supporting equipment to existing non-municipal utility poles.
Body
Dear Council President Crowe, Councilor Sica, Councilor Kinnon, and Council Members:
The purpose of this letter is to (1) update the City Council regarding the federal "Shot Clock" governing the Council's review of the pending grant of location applications described above, and (2) confirm Verizon's understanding of the Council's next actions regarding those applications.
As my colleague, Betsy Mason, explained at the December 13,2016 City Council meeting, the Telecommunications Act of 1996, codified as 47 U"S.C. sec.332, et. seq. (the "TCA") states that a local government "shall act on any request for authorization to place, construct, or modiff personal wireless service facilities within a reasonable period of time after the request is duly filed" (emphasis added). In2009, the Federal Communications Commission issued ruling No. 09-99 (the "FCC Ruling"), which provides specific time periods to define "a reasonable period of time." For collocations on existing structures, a municipality has 90 days from the date an application is received by the municipality to process and reach a final decision on that application.
The City Council received the pending applications on November 18, 2016. When the Council considered the applications at its meeting on December 13, 2016,26 days had lapsed from the "Shot Clock," leaving 64 days remaining. At that meeting, the City Council requested further information and materials regarding the proposed Small Cell installations and tabled the applications. Under the FCC Ruling, that request stopped the "shot Clock" until Verizon could respond. On April ll,20ll, the City Council received Verizon's supplemental filing responding to the Council's requests. The Council re-opened the applications at its meeting...
Click here for full text